Talk:Grandaddy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 24 March 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Message box".[[Category:Script error: No such module "good article topics". good articles|Grandaddy]] Script error: No such module "Banner shell".


Untitled

i can see there's some real fans of grandaddy out there - but i think the hyperbole could be lost from the article

Article organisation

Latest comment: 17 July 20051 comment1 person in discussion

I am not too familiar with the Wikipedia style guide, but I get the feeling this article would look and read a lot better if we got rid of the huge logo, downsized the band photo, and had all the discography on one page. It's not warranted splitting up such a short article over several sections. Galaga88 14:23, 17 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Eh?

"The feeling at the meeting was described by Lytle as the result of a breakdown in communication between the band members" - is the band simply the members as a whole? Conflicted individuals...

Awesome random notes, Mr. anonymous. Burn my bridge for me. Sleepy_boy_on_the_tracks

Needs Fixing

Latest comment: 3 December 20061 comment1 person in discussion

One of the "Split Singles," Alan Parsons... is not in fact split, and that article mistakenly says that it is a non-album single. In fact, it was released on the It's a Cool Cool Christmas Compilation. Additionally, the "compilations" section puts all bootlegs in there, which aren't really compilations. - Zeichman —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zeichman (talk • contribs) 02:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Grandaddyphotoshoot.jpg

Latest comment: 4 June 20071 comment1 person in discussion
File:Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Grandaddyphotoshoot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Indietronic Link

Latest comment: 20 April 20081 comment1 person in discussion

The linked word 'indietronic' just links to the electronic music, which doesn't mention 'indietronic' as far as I can see. --Notquitethere (talk) 13:36, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merger

Latest comment: 9 August 20119 comments4 people in discussion

A moderate amount of the article Alan Parsons in a Winter Wonderland should be merged into this article at which point the former article should be replaced with a redirect. The most important section from "Reception" that should be merged is the quote from Scott Miller as that is the only review that specifically relates to Grandaddy. Ryan Vesey Review me! 03:56, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

We have articles for several of Grandaddy's singles. It makes no sense to merge one of them into the Grandaddy article, as if all the others don't exist. Most of these articles are short but many can be expanded. It would be much better to merge of all of these together into a separate article or a section of the discography rather than merge odd ones into the band article. I'm a bit puzzled by the statement above about the reviews - they all discuss this song by Grandaddy, so how can only one of them relate to Grandaddy?--Michig (talk) 06:16, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree with Michig. Lachlanusername (talk) 08:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
If the article is merged into Grandaddy, it would require a significant reduction of the information found in the article. In my experience with biographies, it is most appropriate to include the information most relevant to the subject of the article. The fact that the song was downright silly might be relevant to the song but not to the artist. The fact that Scott Miller stated that Grandaddy deserved immortality is the only thing that would add information about Grandaddy to the article about him. Ryan Vesey Review me! 19:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Grandaddy is a band, not a person. This isn't a biography. This article really needs a lot of expansion to cover the band properly. I would suggest that when that's done it will be easier to judge how much information is relevant and where it fits best.--Michig (talk) 09:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
FYI: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Laughing_Stock_(song) ... I commented there that this discussion was happening and linked to this discussion. It should be considered in the Merge as well. Hopefully a relist will happen to give a bit more time for it to happen. Exit2DOS • Ctrl • Alt • Del 19:47, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

If anyone fancies improving the articles in this area, the Grandaddy discography article should ideally be expanded to include fuller details of the releases - labels, dates, tracklistings etc. This would eventually adequately replace a lot of the shorter articles on the band's singles. When that's done, we can see what information we have left and determine what is best to do with it. And please, people, consider merging and/or redirecting as options WP:BEFORE taking these articles to AFD.--Michig (talk) 21:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have expanded the It's a Cool Cool Christmas article to include most of the content from the Alan Parsons article. I would suggest that redirecting there might now be the best option.--Michig (talk) 17:53, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I went ahead with a redirect. Both editors now agree that the article should not be in place and a redirect seems like the best option which both should agree with. Ryan Vesey Review me! 18:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Grandaddy/GA1

External links modified

Latest comment: 24 March 20171 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 40 external links on Grandaddy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Retrieved from "http://debianws.lexgopc.com/wiki143/index.php?title=Talk:Grandaddy&oldid=1550594"