Talk:Graham Coxon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 September 2021 by Rowdythere in topic Picture?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Hometown

Graham is from Fordham, in the borough of Colchester. Shouldn't this article be updated to show that. I know it's the same borough, but it's still a village in its own right and pretty boring with that - Fordham needs help.

work with Paul Weller, Mani and Zak Starkey?

I just saw them all performing live on BBC1, on Friday Night with Jonathon Ross, I hadn't heard anything about this, something needs to be added to the article! This is a pretty amazing super group! Does anybody have any better photographs than the one used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iheartsausages (talk • contribs) 14:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Graham Coxon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Graham Coxon Deletion Log

Regarding the deletion log made by admin SlimVirgin on BLP Graham Coxon, user Suzi Grossman should provide further clarification on claim that 'the section about him having a daughter born in 2016 is factually incorrect our client sees this as abusive and is causing upset to him and his family'. Several other sources cite the birth of a child on 2016. User should clarify whether (a) the year of birth is inaccurate or (b) reports about the birth were fictitious and fall under vandalism guidelines. In case of the latter, record should be made that such reports reports are in fact false so that other publications can make similar revisions. Furthermore, the information on remainder of the session ('personal life') are citable and verifiable so removal of the whole paragraph was arguably not necessary unless user has provided further reasoning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.251.249 (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Picture?

Should there be a new picture? This one seems kind of outdated. Rowdythere (talk) 15:01, 3 September 2021 (UTC)Reply