Talk:Gloria Steinem
Script error: No such module "Message box".
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gloria Steinem Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Annual readership
GA concerns
I am concerned that this article might not meet the GA criteria anymore for the following reasons:
- The election support section stops at 2016, and does not comment on 2020 or the upcoming election.
- There are many uncited sentences and paragraphs
- There are many short, one sentence paragraphs, especially in the Activism section
Is anyone interested in working on this article? If not, it might be sent to GAR. The user who nominated this article for GA status seems to have vanished so I don't know who to ping to notify them. Z1720 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Is it appropriate to do her introduction as a feminist without mentioning that she was an state asset...
Is it appropriate to do her introduction as a feminist without mentioning that she was an state asset to separate feminism from class issues? Should that not take precedent on the hierarchy of information of her identity? Maosid (talk) 15:27, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Gloria Steinem/1}}