Talk:Girlie men

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 25 December 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

"used by some"

"used by some" Note the passive of non-attribution in this assertion. Foolishness attempting to masquerade as coxcombry. --Wetman 18:09, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Original research

"However, it has been put forth that attributing the phrase as derogatory to homosexuals by critics is due to their own issues with stereotyping homosexual men as effeminate."

This is orginal research. I once received a warning for less than this.

And "testicular fortitude"? What kind of wording is that for an encyclopedia?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by A gx7 (talkcontribs) 09:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC).Reply

Irony

"The two characters, somewhat ironically, were characterized as cousins of Schwarzenegger's." What is ironic about this? 71.136.232.178 (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Two sides

"a variety of blogs on both sides of the ideological fence" There's an ideological fence with two sides? I don't think so. 71.136.232.178 (talk) 15:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bias

This article is extremely bias. It only depicts Schwarzenegger's use of the word in a political context. This phrase was used as to describe heterosexual men who appear and act physically weak. The whole article should be deleted or rewritten. Evidently this article has been rewritten by some angry homosexual looking for a cause. Dumaka (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Girlie men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply