Talk:George Dalgarno
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Javirl 11:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC) This article lacks reference to Dalgarno's artificial language, which is truly interesting. I'll add it when I have the time.
what kind of language?
These are different concepts; to choose between them, I'd need to know a bit more about his purposes. —Tamfang (talk) 22:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- They are different concepts now, but at the time (1600s) universality is pretty much what all the philosophical languages were going for. (Or looking for the original 'Adamic language', but I think they'd consider that roughly equivalent to 'universal'.) See e.g. Leibniz's similar work at around the same period. I don't know Dalgarno's, but it's a reasonable guess that it was doing the same. --Sai ¿?✍ 00:20, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on George Dalgarno. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060810201023/http://www.cce.ufsc.br/~espanhol/projborges/tlon.htm to http://www.cce.ufsc.br/~espanhol/projborges/tlon.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 13 October 2017 (UTC)