Talk:Gavin Esler

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 October 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives Template:Broken anchors

Bibliography section

As the article already lists his books in the body of the article, I rather think duplicating that which is already in the article is silly. Is there any actual need to name books twice? We do not even give a "full bibliography" for many authors - and I regret that Esler is not quite the world's most major author. Collect (talk) 13:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's quite commmon to have a separate bibliography section in a biography; and much of the information there (ISBNs, for example) is not duplicated. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:34, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Common? Oh? If we need ISBNs then we can add them to the section which already names each and every book. And remove the separate Bibliography. If we do not need the internal full and complete list in the article, then we ought to delete it from the article. One or the other - just as we do not have "external links" and "see also" duplicate material already in a quite short article. Collect (talk) 15:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
I don't think ISBNs belong in the text. And I'd agree that a list is better presented as a list. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:25, 28 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
There is a quote which is presented as being from a New Statesman review of Esler's book Angry Americans. The quote is that the book is a vivid portrait of America in the 1990's. Could this have been written by Albert Scardino in the New Statesman; 24 October 1997, Volume 126, Issue 4357, page 46? Can anyone with access to their archives check? Drchriswilliams (talk) 20:38, 29 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Esler's Role in Guildford Four and Maguire Seven

How would it be best to add some information on Esler's role in highlighting the miscarriage of the Guildford Four and Maguire Seven? Would it be best here, on his page, or on the Guildford_Four_and_Maguire_Seven specific page? The sources I have found so far:

Would adding a line to the 'Career' section about his time at Spotlight (the Northern Ireland program) and mentioning the his role in highlighting the case with be appropriate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clifford Smithe (talkcontribs) 09:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gavin Esler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 11 October 2017 (UTC)Reply