Talk:Fusion power
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fusion power Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config Template:Section sizes
Unexplained Diagram Is Too Technical
The graph in the Triple product needs to be clarified so that nonspecialists can understand it. It was copy-pasted from some preprint article with no usable explanation. It is graphed in terms of Q and "trapping" neither of which are mentioned, let alone explained, anywhere in the article. The dots on the graph aren't mentioned or explained in the caption. Is this supposed to show how far the various experiments are from some theoretical target? Or what? Copy-pasting something from a journal article with a caption of unexplained ultra-technical jargon and undefined variables does not help anyone. 2601:441:5000:13E0:0:0:0:932F (talk) 02:22, 15 March 2025 (UTC)