Talk:Foreskin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 March 2025 by 89.187.180.57 in topic Illogique reasoning
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config

History section is a little weak

I don't have time right now (I'll try at a later date) but the history section seems a little sparse. I think we can do better than that folks. 2600:8807:810A:9F80:AA71:899E:5BF9:5027 (talk) 04:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Illogique reasoning

According to the « In the March 2017 publication of the Global Health Journal: Science and Practice, Morris and Krieger wrote, "The variability in foreskin size is consistent with the foreskin being a vestigial structure". » since woman clitoris hood also vary in size and length and do not always cover the head of the clitoris then according to the same logic the clitoris good is a vestigial structure. I see a paradox… 89.187.180.57 (talk) 14:31, 15 March 2025 (UTC)Reply