Talk:Foothill Freeway
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Foothill Freeway Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:WikiProject banner shell
Requested move 9 January 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Interstate 210 and State Route 210 (California) → Template:No redirect – This should be moved over the redirect to simplify the title. Since the Foothill Freeway encompasses both Interstate 210 and California State Route 210, it should be no different than Capital Beltway, Massachusetts Turnpike, Summerlin Parkway and other similar pages where their respective route numbers (Template:No redirect, Template:No redirect, and Template:No redirect) are redirects. Several Southern California freeways such as the Foothill are also commonly referred to by their freeway names instead of just their route numbers like the Hollywood Freeway and the Ventura Freeway. Zzyzx11 (talk) 19:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Is CA 210 the Foothill Freeway? I've not heard that before. --Rschen7754 19:19, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I guess it is. Support because while I'm generally not a fan of names other than the route number, in this case the name with the route number is horrendously long. --Rschen7754 19:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)