Talk:Flavia Colgan

Doesn't satisfy Wikipedia standards

Utter lack of notability. Why is this still here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avocats (talk • contribs) 04:20, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Probably because of a Wikipedia community desire to add more biographies of women, and women of Latina heritage, to "balance" the content here. - 332dash (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Sign. ¡ ¿ [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]]

Maybe there could be links beteen Flavia Monteiro Colgan & flavia_?

Thank You.

[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 00:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

There is an Oaxaca activist named Flavio Sosa.

2006_Oaxaca_protests.

[[ hopiakuta | [[ [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] -]] 16:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flavia Colgan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071031160735/http://bigsight.org/flaviacolgan to http://www.bigsight.org/flaviacolgan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Notability

Template:Ping I notice you added Template:Tl to the article. May you list them here (or in the article) so we don't get another AfD? ~UN6892 ^t_c 18:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

The ELs contain some reference materials. - UtherSRG (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Template:Ping I looked at the external links given. I can't access WSJ so I'll assume you read it and it is indeed about Colgan. It and Citizen Hunter (at least an archive of it) seem to both have SIGCOV of her, though I am unsure of the latter's reliability given it's an advocacy site. Mainline Today seems reliable but all of it except one paragraph is an interview (not independent) so I don't think it is significant. The rest are either dead or not independent, so I am unsure if the subject is notable. The WP:BEFORE search I did was inconclusive. ~UN6892 ^t_c 23:14, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

There's also a Media Matters piece (which I found during that search), though the source's reliability is uncertain. ~UN6892 ^t_c 23:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)