Talk:Final Fantasy VI
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Final Fantasy VI Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Refideas
Cleanup Tag
Do we agree or not that the legacy section needs a trim or rewrite? It’s a very famous game, and its legacy section should probably be long in the first place. Should we keep the tag, or remove it? Or Does someone want to rewrite the section? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Alert some of the all-stars as well: Template:Ping, Template:Ping, Template:Ping. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Seems to have the same problems as some other Final Fantasy articles like "He was listed as most popular character in 2010. In 2012, he was listed as the most popular story, etc" using multiple quotes. It's kinda like the issue we had with Rinoa's article. Probably the best solution is writing something like "It has often been listed as one of the best games by Square and gaming in general" in order to provide generalizations over undue weight.Tintor2 (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- The legacy section looked a little questionable. I decided to do a rewrite. As to the "Retrospective" section, I'd suggest doing some summarising and cutting the quotes, and that should fix the issue. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Absolutely amazing, it’s fixed just like that. You are really gems of Wikipedians. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- The legacy section looked a little questionable. I decided to do a rewrite. As to the "Retrospective" section, I'd suggest doing some summarising and cutting the quotes, and that should fix the issue. --ProtoDrake (talk) 18:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
- Seems to have the same problems as some other Final Fantasy articles like "He was listed as most popular character in 2010. In 2012, he was listed as the most popular story, etc" using multiple quotes. It's kinda like the issue we had with Rinoa's article. Probably the best solution is writing something like "It has often been listed as one of the best games by Square and gaming in general" in order to provide generalizations over undue weight.Tintor2 (talk) 17:40, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
"Dream oath opera" listed at Redirects for discussion
File:Information.svg A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dream oath opera. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 29#Dream oath opera until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 15:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Review table
I feel that the review table is way too big, especially when only a handful of sources reviewed the other versions of the games. It should be limited to only the SNES version, in my opinion. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 05:11, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Release Date?
Says "October 11, 1994". But I got this on my birthday in August of this year. So how is that possible? 185.85.155.35 (talk) 14:31, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- "Street dates" weren't kept to very strictly back then. August seems pretty early, though, seeing as all of the magazine reviews came out in the October/November issues. --PresN 18:55, 19 June 2025 (UTC)