Talk:Fernão Pires de Andrade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 14 January 2019 by Ktsquare in topic translation into Chinese Wikipedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written:
    Pass no problems there.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:
    Pass though I would recommend getting more sources if the article is to be improved any further. It looks like all of the information comes from 10 or so sources, and A- or FA- class articles usually have several dozen. I would recommend adding more sources so that the article's neutrality cannot be called into question. Also I would recommend adding external links to the references; if the books don't have their own websites, then a source like amazon.com will do.
  3. It is broad in its coverage:
    Pass The article is very strong in this respect.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    Pass no problems there.
  5. It is stable:
    Pass no problems there.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:
    Pass plenty of images.
  7. Overall:
    The article is very well written and extensive. It is definately GA quality. -Ed! (talk) 22:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Awesome! Thanks. I'm glad you liked the article.--Pericles of AthensTalk 06:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fernão Pires de Andrade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

translation into Chinese Wikipedia

The UTC 04:40, 24 September 2003 version of this article had been or the UTC 02:05, 21 October 2006 version was translated into Chinese wikipedia --- Ktsquare (talk) 04:46, 14 January 2019 (UTC)Reply