Talk:Fault mechanics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 25 July 2024 by Mikenorton in topic Needs rewriting
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:WikiProject banner shell

Untitled

I wanted to add something relating rock mechanics to fault mechanics, since this is an exciting new field opening up. My audience is always the high-school student who wants to go a bit deeper into things. --Zeizmic 13:06, 26 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Query

The way this is written it makes me wonder who nabbed it out of whose book. Aside from it having about zero to do with the actual mechanics of faulting (see geological fault) re: shear and strain, it has the sound of a passage yanked from someone else's work. In my jaundiced opinion. Regardless, I'd still lke to see some detail put into the shear stress/strain side of this area.Rolinator 05:32, 27 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Fault mechanics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Needs rewriting

I honestly don't really understand what this article is trying to say. We definitely need an article on this topic but not this one. It's very short on citations and there are several things, like "the concept of a following force" that are a mystery to me. It's another of the fault-related articles on Wikipedia that need work. My self-imposed task is to rewrite all of them so that they are consistent with each other and the science - whether I can make them accessible to all readers is another matter. I should have done something about this in 2006 when Rolinator made his comment. Mikenorton (talk) 18:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

I will base the rewrite on Chris Scholz's 2007 contribution to the "Treatise on Geophysics Volume 6", because It's an excellent summary that covers the ground. The new article will, of course, not be in anything like the detail of Scholz's summary and may need a little updating, although I'm not aware of much in the field that's changed since 2007. Mikenorton (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)Reply