Talk:Fable (2004 video game)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080417112438/http://www.computerandvideogames.com:80/article.php?id=90363 to http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=90363

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/previews/fable_3
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140822065548/http://www.robosoftin.com:80/what-we-do to http://www.robosoftin.com/what-we-do#portfolio/mac
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202203820/http://pixelvolt.com/2014/02/02/dont-overlook-fable-anniversary/ to http://pixelvolt.com/2014/02/02/dont-overlook-fable-anniversary/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/reviews/fable
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://uk.xbox.gamespy.com/xbox/fable/546898p1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080912033633/http://www.metacritic.com:80/games/platforms/xbx/fable?q=fable to http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fable?q=fable
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725052750/http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fablethelostchapters/review.html to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/rpg/fablethelostchapters/review.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/previews/fable-lost-chapters_7
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081205234953/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6111138.html to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6111138.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203141853/http://www.gamespot.com:80/news/6121637.html?tag=result;title;1 to http://www.gamespot.com/news/6121637.html?tag=result;title;1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fable (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081025182027/http://www.music4games.net/Features_Display.aspx?id=17 to http://www.music4games.net/Features_Display.aspx?id=17
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081024195656/http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fablethelostchapters?q=fable to http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbx/fablethelostchapters?q=Fable

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 7 January 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed. The confusion with the 1996 video game is too great. ToThAc (talk) 18:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

---

Fable (video game) → Template:No redirect – To disambiguate the title from Fable (1996 video game). The leftover redirect, Template:No redirect, would then be retargeted to Fable (disambiguation)#Video games. Steel1943 (talk) 04:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

• er, support obviously, but Template:Ping per WP:MOVE why bring to RM? In ictu oculi (talk) 08:59, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping There's a possible reason to oppose this move, but I'm not sure if I feel like putting beans up my nose. Steel1943 (talk) 14:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

- :P In ictu oculi (talk) 15:11, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

• Support of course, and I'm the last guy who'll tell you to skip RMs :p Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 09:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
• Support Non controversial move though._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
• Support. The RM was a good idea considering the nonsense surrounding similarly named articles that somehow have "primary" disambiguators. —Xezbeth (talk) 18:19, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Conflicting information

This New York Times article [1] mentions the development time was three years and involved 80 people. While here it's mentioned 4 years and 70 people. Which source should we use here? Timur9008 (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Given they're from the same vintage and they're both mainstream publications, I wouldn't really privilege one over the other, especially since, especially for the time frame, they could be counting prototypes and the like in one count, but not the other. I think best choice here is include the range in the prose (70–80 people or 'roughly 80 people') or include the discrepancy in a Template:Tl for max clarity. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 17:01, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Yes check.svg Done Timur9008 (talk) 17:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)