Talk:Extraterrestrial UFO hypothesis

Geography

The geography section reads like an opinion essay arguing in favor of ETH. It seems clear to me that it conflicts with Wikipedia's policies. I'm curious as to why it hasn't been altered or removed.

Do you mean that scientists are forbidden to argue in favor of a hypothesis. The things I learn from Wikipedia!

Kortoso (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Fermi Paradox

IMHO, the Fermi paradox ought to be addressed here somehow, especially in light of recent revelations regarding billions and billions of recently discovered habitable planets.

Any ideas regarding treatment? Kortoso (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Agree. I think the Fermi paradox should be referenced. Not extensively, but with one or two sentences. It could fit into the "opinions of scientists" section. Perhaps elsewhere. Use your best judgment.--GodBlessYou2 (talk) 22:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Only if some reliably published sources have made such a connection WP:OR, and only if it represents a significant portion of the voices in the discussions. WP:UNDUE -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 01:00, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

The connection is made in many, if not most of the sources identified in Fermi Paradox, for example here. Fermi's proposition of his paradox was a direct argument against giving credence to the claims of UFO sightings.--GodBlessYou2 (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

It's a slightly old discussion but considering that the article currently only includes a see-also link to it, I agree that more relevant coverage would be adequate. While the fermi paradox allows the possibility of the universe being populated with other life, it at the same time explains why two civilizations are unlikely to ever discover eachother, considering the rarity and distance in space and/or time. —PaleoNeonate – 10:58, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Absolutely, +1 -- {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 12:45, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Extraterrestrial hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071203015119/http://www.scifi.com:80/ufo/roper/05.html to http://www.scifi.com/ufo/roper/05.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Extraterrestrial hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060206064749/http://ncas.sawco.com/ufosymposium/harder.html to http://ncas.sawco.com/ufosymposium/harder.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101125162907/http://mufon.com/MUFONNews/znews_oberth.html to http://www.mufon.com/MUFONNews/znews_oberth.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111124052154/https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/Petitions to https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Extraterrestrial hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051111004644/http://www.mufon.com/znews_publicopinion.html to http://www.mufon.com/znews_publicopinion.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928234930/http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1538 to http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1538
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928234811/http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1551 to http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/astrobio/astrobio_detail.cfm?ID=1551
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090716113351/http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_part2.pdf to http://www.ufoevidence.org/newsite/files/COMETA_part2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Le Pays, June 17, 1864

An inhabitant of the planet Mars (Henri de Parville) (fr: art.) "Synopsis: Des savants découvrent, aux États-Unis, près du Pic James dans le Kansas, un aérolithe provenant de la planète Mars = Scientists discover, in the United States, near James Peak in Kansas, an aerolith from the planet Mars." - is not a relevant inclusion - no UFO included - is id'd before extraterr. discovered.

"Ce canular se prolonge pendant six mois = This hoax lasted for six months" Autour de l’œuvre=wikipedia & "Initially written in 1864 as a hoax by the science correspondent of the French newspaper Le Pays" blackcoatpress.com (𒌋*𓆏)𓆭 23:47, 2 May 2025 (UTC)