Talk:Excipient

Requested move

Excipient → Pharmaceutical excipient – to distinguish information as and to start seperate page called Cosmetic Excipient

---

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

• Neutral, but if you move it at least follow the naming conventions and make the second word lower-case. --Angr/ 08:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

Discussion

Add any additional comments

I'm definetly in favor of piping. I.e. excipient (pharmaceutics). Peter ^Isotalo 14:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

The redlinks would appear to indicate that this move doesn't require sysop intervention. And, meanwhile, there's nothing impeding the creation of the other article at either Excipient (cosmetics) or Cosmetic excipient. –Hajor 01:04, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Excipient. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://apps.who.int/prequal/trainingresources/pq_pres/TrainingZA-April07/Excipients.ppt
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140809100407/http://www.ipapharma.org/epharmatimes/Mar2013/ to http://www.ipapharma.org/epharmatimes/Mar2013/#65

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)