Latest comment: 28 January 20156 comments3 people in discussion
Does it still deserve to be called so? I see 2 [citation needed] tags, 1 [peacock term] tag and one [not in citation given] tag. Someone pls fix those, else supporting statements should be removed. I don't edit articles on wildlife, I just check how good they are. Kailash29792 (talk) 19:33, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I did much of the work on it many moons ago. The best thing about FA status is that it acts as an index point to measure future changes against. Will do so later today. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 20:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
I have to hold up my hand for the offending lead sentence. Actually I have learnt better since to just let the facts speak for themselves. I have dealt with 2 Script error: No such module "Unsubst". tags and removed the peacock sentence. I can't see the other one. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 21:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
It's an informative article, although it lacks information about sexual dimorphism. I copy edited a section today, and I fear that a thorough copy editing is needed to preserve the featured-article status, particularly after having excised the hyphen in "heavily-studied". isa00:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
The last bit of the section (with the unformatted ref) is new I think. The section above it was all present tense apart from one perfect tense ("has shown") - I don't care whether it is present or past, as long as it is consistent. I did think perfect tense was alright with the present tense. I don't see a problem with "heavily-studied", but am not fussed whether there is a hyphen there or not. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 03:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC)Reply
Is not a, the article has comparative wieghts and reports that the plumage is similar, so I am not sure what you think is missing regarding sexual dimorphism....can you please elaborate? Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 04:05, 28 January
Outdated "Relationship with humans" section
Latest comment: 28 January 20152 comments2 people in discussion
"It almost always breeds on stable pack ice near the coast and up to 18 km (11 mi) offshore."
then later:
"The yearly reproductive cycle begins at the start of the Antarctic winter, in March and April, when all mature Emperor Penguins travel to colonial nesting areas, often walking 50 to 120 km (31 to 75 mi) inland from the edge of the pack ice."
Maybe showing my ignorance but I can't make much sense of these. Words like offshore and inland are unclear when there's ice off the coast. Nigej (talk) 09:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Dogs and penguins
Latest comment: 19 January 20141 comment1 person in discussion
Dogs were removed on the fear that that carried Canine Distemper or other diseases which might affect seals. Sadly the British Antarctic Survey dogs all died of typical dog diseases within a few years of their return [1] presumably because they had spent generations in a isolated environment.
Latest comment: 12 April 20193 comments2 people in discussion
Eblackadder3, please explain why you have not been using edit summaries while editing this featured article for Template:Trim&oldid=Template:Trim the past 9 months. I reverted the first edit you made in July because you added content without it being clear whether or not that was present in the listed source – do you understand what that means? Rhinopias (talk) 23:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Template:Ping for posting. I'd seen some changes in passing but had not looked in depth until I saw the summary of the differences above. Some changes are improvements but most are adding redundant emotional words, repeating material that does not need repeating or (more worryingly) the changing of numbers without changing the source. I've gone through the article and reviewed all changes. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 00:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
No, thank you for actually making the changes! Too daunting of a task for me right now. I've posted on Eblackadder3's talk page also (which they have never edited). If we do not receive a response from them and they continue to edit the article, we can suggest a block at ANI until they say they'll participate... Rhinopias (talk) 00:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Disappearance of the Halley Bay Colony
Latest comment: 28 April 20194 comments3 people in discussion
In 2016 the Halley Bay Colony essentially disappeared when bad weather destroyed the sea-ice the colony was on. This caused the chicks to drown and the adults to abandon the colony. The adults have not seemed to make an attempted to reestablish the colony and the ice did not reform in 2017 or 2018, but the Dawson-Lambton Colony has seen a rise in numbers since:
Script error: No such module "citation/CS1".
Should this be included? Should it have its own section? It seems relevant and important to me, but I have not edited the article because I'm not sure how/if it would best be included. Downfall Vision (talk) 10:57, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have expanded on Jchevali's addition. I think it's appropriate here, as long as the section doesn't get too long/convoluted with examples that don't add much. Sentences could probably get reordered... Rhinopias (talk) 23:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have uploaded a photo of the Halley Emperor colony in 1998,99 incase it proves to be of use
Without a comparison image showing population size I don't think the image adds anything to the section. If Halley Bay didn't redirect to the research station, there could be content about the penguin colony and a photo there... Rhinopias (talk) 21:51, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I don't see anywhere in the lead or taxonomy, where I'd expect to find it, that an Emperor Penguin is a bird. I think most people know, but it's not patently obvious that it isn't for example, an aquatic mammal. That it is a bird is mentioned a few times under other sections, but what an animal is should be in the lead, eh? Sbalfour (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 August 20201 comment1 person in discussion
There are plenty of youtube videos that show the Emperor Penguins height is less than 3 feet. The article said something else. Any thoughts on a reliable reference for height? Thanks, Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 04:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Threatened
Latest comment: 26 October 20221 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 31 October 20223 comments2 people in discussion
For some reason, the range map in the speciesbox template displays as a link and not as an image. I commented it out because I can't figure out how to fix it. Michael7604 (talk) 03:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
The sentence "although an individual can maintain its core temperature from 38.0 °C (100.4 °F) down to −47 °C (−53 °F)" seemed a little too extreme to me so I looked up the source, but couldn't find anything on maintaining core temperature in air temperatures of up to 38 degrees Celsius (please correct me if I'm wrong). Maybe the sentence is meant to be "although an individual can maintain its core temperature of 38.0 °C (100.4 °F) down to −47 °C (−53 °F)"? Replacing "from" with "of". 176.88.77.229 (talk) 15:31, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Size?
Latest comment: 6 March 20251 comment1 person in discussion