Talk:Electoral wipeout
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Untitled
I disagree strongly with the current text of the last section, "Voting systems to reduce wipe-out results", which currently contains this line: "The first change is to convert FPTP into some other system, IRV is best, but you can try LimV, AppV. With voting machines, one might even allow the voter to choose which system to use, because you can convert LimV and AppV to IRV." It is laughable to say that "IRV is best" so easily, with no explanation. - McCart42 (talk) 04:33, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- For the record, that stuff had sat there basically untouched for nearly 2 years: [1] 68.39.174.238 03:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Mongolia
Wasn't sure how and whether this needed citing, but to be safe: here's a link (2000) and here's another (1996)
Requested move 27 June 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Wipeout (elections) → Electoral wipeout – per WP:NATURAL HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 16:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Rename per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sensible proposal. Number 57 02:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better to link to.--Aréat (talk) 17:36, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
What the term "wipeout" or "wiped out" means.
Being "wiped out" in an election, suffering an electoral "wipe out", means there is no one left, from that political party, in the body up for election. The article did not make that clear - so I have edited it, in order to make that clear. 2A02:C7C:E1BA:CE00:5538:3FC2:F496:BEA5 (talk) 08:30, 15 August 2024 (UTC)