Talk:EGOT
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the EGOT Script error: No such module "pagetype".. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Old XfD multi". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
competitive/honorary distinction
Offering a belated reply Template:Reply to I concur with your March 2024 observation that this article fails to explain the distinction between competitive and non-competitive awards before employing this nuance. I'd further contend that the article's current tone and structure overemphasizes the matter altogether. Winners are winners; the boundaries do not demand a competitive/non-competitive distinction. The larger table of EGOT winners already notes several nuanced distinctions among those achievements; surely an additional note could adequately specify the honorary awards among six EGOT winners. Indeed, the subsequent list (on Three competitive awards) makes the point with the "NCA" note. (Reusing the same notation throughout these lists would likely benefit the average/casual reader.) In short, the structural treatment of competitive/non-competitive awards merits serious reconsideration. — HipLibrarianship talk 03:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Suggested move to "EGOT"
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)
List of EGOT winners → EGOT – The term "EGOT" for the title of the article is simpler and more broad. Other lists of winners of media awards are under just the name of the award, i.e. Triple Crown of Acting and Academy Honorary Award. ClovisBarnhopper (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support. I think the current title is a little too narrow. There is stuff in this article about PEGOT, REGOT, and EGOT equivalents outside US. The proposal makes more sense. --Quiz shows 01:03, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support per WP:CONCISE ―Howard • 🌽33 12:45, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
- Support. Obvious improvement. -- Cerebral726 (talk) 20:18, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
Add Leslie Odom Jr. to "Without an Oscar" list
As stated above. Kaeldi07 (talk) 18:43, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Add Maggie Smith to the list of winners
The wiki article on Maggie Smith reflects that she has won all of these awards 2601:282:80:E9C0:A233:45BA:734:D8DC (talk) 22:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)