Talk:Duklja
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Duklja Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Contentious topics/talk notice
Why is Duklja said to be South Slavic state, when it is clearly stated in the Wiki article that it was Serbian? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vojislavljevi%C4%87_dynasty Is it a crime to write the truth or some kind of conspiracy to delete as much of Serbian name from the Balkans as you can?
Answer: I ask myself that question all the time. It is interesting how Duklja has nothing to do with the modern state of Serbia and how you uploaded made up maps from that time period. There was even a slur "Dukljani", for Montenegrin separatists in former Yugoslavia, derived from mocking their argument that a medieval state of "Duklja" existed in place of modern Montenegro. Serbian official policy was to make jokes about it, as they stated it's a made up state. However, years passed, and since you can't deny Duklja anymore, you just now say it's a Serbian state. Such a pathetic gesture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:19C0:A580:D9BA:7011:3966:FE88 (talk) 21:54, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 March 2025
Template:Edit extended-protected Please add to category “States and territories disestablished in 1186” Deargodman (talk) 00:29, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
