Talk:Down on the Upside
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Down on the Upside Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:Article history Template:WikiProject banner shell
Reviews
What should be done about the reviews down the bottom of the page? I am tempted just to delete them as there are reviews in the infobox, but im looking for a second opinion on this one.Grover 10:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Language Ambiguity
There is some ambiguity at the end of the the first paragraph:
"...sales quickly waned and it failed to match the popularity of predecessor Superunknown. Likewise, in 1996 fellow Seattle grunge rockers Alice in Chains released their last studio album with no major tour, and Pearl Jam's popularity suffered from the release of the idiosyncratic No Code."
It is ambiguous whether Soundgarden did a major tour either (which I am pretty sure they did). Also, the last bit about "No Code" also seems a bit vague.
--Whiteskittlz 03:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Whiteskittlz (talk • contribs) 03:03, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
- Furthermore, AIC's self titled album came out in 95, not 96.65.43.214.58 12:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
"End of grunge" section re-added
I don't know why that was removed, it shows that this was one of the last significant albums released during that era. It is widely agreed upon that 1996 was the last major year for the "grunge" craze, by 1998 the whole thing fizzled out in the mainstream, and I think the section should stay there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.172.234 (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Personnel section
As the personnel section is so cluttered, I feel that columns are necessary for clarity purposes. Darwin's Bulldog (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
I would rather go by Wikipedia policy for this. I'm awaiting clarification for what that is.-5- (talk) 04:11, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Deadlinks
There are two deadlinks that I found that I couldn't find an archived copy on web.archive.org or that don't go to where they should go:
- http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=305&cfgn=Albums&cfn=The+Billboard+200&ci=3023602&cdi=7067011&cid=06%2F08%2F1996 (ref #25)
- http://www.mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum (ref #60)
–MuZemike 22:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
Template:Substituted comment Substituted at 13:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)