Talk:Dominion War

Order and All Episodes

It would be better to mention the episodes in order. For example, the Season 4 section discussed "To the Death" before "Homefront" and "Paradise Lost". But to the Death was episode 23 while HF and PL were 11 and 12 respectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.53.164 (talk) 07:14, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

In addition some episodes aren't mentioned. One example is Broken Link, from season 4.

Attempts at corrections have been reversed. But these corrections are needed.

Comment

Conflict infobox restored. This time it utilizes the FICTIONAL BATTLE infobox. In addition I have also added various information regarding the story arc and it storyline uses in Star Trek Enterprise, especially in the Xindi Crisis. I felt that the page concentrated too much on the critical review and hardly any at all on the actual story itself or its results, most of which can be laid out in an infobox. As it suggests the Fictional Battle Infobox is used for Out-of-Reality occurences and be used to seperate context from the real to the cannonical. Rhatsa26X (talk) 16:31 27 June 2010 (CDT)

I have to say, the specific reasons this and many ST articles were being refused GA status was a: no reference to the television shows critical reception, b: total lack of sources, c: main text of article written entirely from an in-universe perspective and focusing entirely on narrative, and d: a section on results of the fictional war that involved fan speculation. I like this new Fictional War box, especially the info relating it to other story-arcs. It is a better fit than the original 'real war' box which quite rightly had to be removed until a better idea came along, but GA status will hang on the other changes previously mentioned. If we revert the tone of the main article to focus on story narrative, GA would be automatically denied again. Ethdhelwen (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

GA2

Talk:Dominion War/GA2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperMarioMan (talk • contribs) 20:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Point of view?

How can this article be biased when the subject is sy-fy. I am sorry to alienate all the Trekkers, but when the "truth" of the article doesnt exist due to being fiction, it is hard to be neutal. BTW, go Feds!. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.179.96 (talk) 07:33, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

GA3

Talk:Dominion War/GA3 — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Fuchs (talk • contribs) 15:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Section 31 as a combatant???

This makes no sense to me. Autonomous or no, Section 31 is part of the Federation. It shouldn't, IMHO, be listed as a separate combatant. Famartin (talk) 02:26, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Well, the Marquis is comprised mainly of Federation citizens and starfleet officers, however they are rogue. Similarly, Section 31 is comprised of Starfleet intelligence officers and is a rogue organization. It does not obey Federation law, and it does not technically answer to anyone. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 02:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

To be honest I'm not keen on Maquis being listed either, but since Section 31 is likely smaller than either, and includes CURRENT Starfleet officers, its the biggest flaw with the combatant list, IMHO. Famartin (talk) 03:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dominion War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090430065531/http://www.irosf.com:80/q/zine/article/10421 to http://www.irosf.com/q/zine/article/10421

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:47, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 14 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) BilledMammal (talk) 21:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

---

Dominion War → Dominion (Star Trek)Dominion (Star Trek) – This is the real name of the content at the start of this article, with the Dominion war being the second part. 2605:8D80:1395:6A74:64E2:7196:A7F6:BBBA (talk) 18:40, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Star Trek has been notified of this discussion. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 22:30, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose: The majority of the article focuses on the war itself, not the Dominion as a civilization. DonIago (talk) 01:25, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
• Comment: There has been a deletion discussion for Dominion (Star Trek) not so long ago, and as far as I can tell the discussion leaned towards "Dominion (Star Trek)" not being notable on its own, but the "Dominion War" probably being notable. That should be taken into account here. Daranios (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose the proposed topic is non-notable, per the deletion discussion. -- 65.92.247.96 (talk) 07:30, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
  • Procedural close This tries to reverse an AfD outcome. WP:RM is not the correct venue for that. If you wish to overturn deletion, you go through WP:DELREV or open a new WP:AFD -- 65.92.247.96 (talk) 07:36, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.