Talk:Discovered attack

Template:WikiProject banner shell Presumably the diagram should actually have a B on d3? -- Jake 18:01, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

citation needed? seriously?

I get the feeling whoever added the "citation needed" tag to "a discovered checkmate is possible" isn't a person who's familiar with chess. It's one of those self-evident obvious truths to anyone who's played and studied the game even for a few weeks. Sure, it happens quite -rarely- in chess, but I've seen positions where a pawn move would expose the enemy's king to a bishop, rook, or queen into a checkmate. Here, I'm lazy so I'll let SineBot sign my post for me: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.166.123 (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

I'll go along with you. If discovered check is possible then discovered checkmate is also possible. I made the change. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 02:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Discovered attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add Template:Tlx after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add Template:Tlx to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040805203919/http://www.markalowery.net:80/Chess/Tactics_Strategy/Tactics_Lesson2/tactics_lesson2_index.html to http://www.markalowery.net/Chess/Tactics_Strategy/Tactics_Lesson2/tactics_lesson2_index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

1.Bf3+

How is that a winning move? 2A02:17A0:561:9600:AE4C:A27C:364D:C6DE (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

White has a decisive material advantage after 1.Bf3+ K(any) 2.Rxe8. --IHTS (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)