Talk:Degenerative disc disease

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 May 2023 by 31.20.106.40 in topic Pseudoscience recommended as treatment
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Reliable sources for medical articles

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

File:Sciences humaines.svg This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AhsanSaeedd.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Reply

Headline text

--70.119.181.100 23:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)The content of this page is copied verbatim from [1]. Do we have the copyrightholder's permission to use it under the GFDL? Thue | talk 11:22, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)Reply

                            Billy's Notes Added; {10-27-2005}

1] I have been diagnosed w/ this disease about 5 years ago. It really isn't a disease though. 2} DDD causes Osteophytes, i.e. bone spurs. These spurs poke themselves into muscles, nerves, & tissues. 3}

Image

Where does the image come from? Please email me your answer. See my User page for email. -- Fyslee 22:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page Title and URL reference

Degenerative disc disease is commonly spelled Degenerative disk disease. Because DISK is spelled DISC in this article both references should be used. Bdelisle 18:11, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

In the medical world "disc" is by far the most common spelling for an intervertebral disc:
-- Fyslee 18:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


alternative treatements

should there not be something about alternative treatements such as proliferant injection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noserider (talkcontribs) 14:26, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Section notes on "Possible Causes of DDD"

The content of the article's concluding section, "Possible Causes of DDD," is little more than gibberish. If the content is, in fact, pertinent to a discussion of the possible causes of DDD, an explanation of the relationship between the facts presented and the development of DDD should be elucidated. As it is, the entire section is so muddled that the legitimacy of the rest of the article is seriously impugned. The section, "Possible Causes of DDD," should be either clarified or simply removed. QueenoftheWags (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sources

What is Intervertebral Disc Degeneration, and What Causes It? (2006) is freely-accessible (need a Medscape account) and a good source. II | (t - c)

Imaging findings often clinically irrelevant

This article would be a scary read for someone who just was told there was DDD seen on their imaging reports. It has been known for some time that DDD seen on imaging is most commonly not clinically relevant and this idea should receive significant mention in this article. Here is a recent review: [2] Quote: "Imaging findings of spine degeneration are present in high proportions of asymptomatic individuals, increasing with age. Many imaging-based degenerative features are likely part of normal aging and unassociated with pain. These imaging findings must be interpreted in the context of the patient’s clinical condition." 2001:56A:75B7:9B00:1CD2:C8F4:CB20:61F3 (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Degenerative disc disease. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Degenerative disc disease

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Degenerative disc disease's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ReferenceA":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 16:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pseudoscience recommended as treatment

"Treatment may include chiropractic to reduce pain". Is this vandalism? 31.20.106.40 (talk) 11:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply