Talk:Daniel Puder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 31 January 2018 by Dlohcierekim in topic Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are here
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Article review

page needs a look over--Doublecheck 18:16, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

I took out all the text that was taken verbatim from WWE.com's bio and TV Tome's profile. WWE.com text is copyrighted and the TV Tome text is copyrighted by the writer of the text. I'll add some info later if I can but you can take the WWE.com bio and TVTome Filmography and translate it into original text, then cite the two sources as references or link to them. --Jtalledo 14:47, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
I have clean up the page and added the pro wrestlers bio standard. Paulley
You might want to check, but I don't think Puder was ever actually in the UFC. I think I remember Mike Mizanan keep bringging that up during TE... DangerousDave

I believe his MMA history is a little biased, and the MMA event he was at was quite small, there weren't many fans there at all(from the video I saw). He wore a "I hurt Kurt" t-shirt.

I went and cut one unnecessary sentence that went overboard on the Puder-love. The Strikeforce show mentioned in the article as being the biggest in the U.S. was the first Strikeforce event which was headlined by Frank Shamrock vs. Cesar Gracie. It drew over 18,000 people. SubSeven 18:46, 12 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The article changes from past to present tense several times when talking about the Puter-Angle match.

I think the wording of the Puder-Angle match needs to be chanfed slightly. Angle may have tapped out to his hold but it wouldn't have necessarily made it to TV since Smackdown is and was at the time a taped show. I would predict that it would have been cut out altogether but that's just my opinion.

Trained by and Debuted?

WTF! Look At the Profile! chris 06:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Can someone please fix this! Please have some respect for Puder! You stupid ****ing ****s who don't have anything to do but ****ing vandalize articles all day! What, you can't get a real job, you stupid ***wipes! I bet your still living in your mom's house you dump****s or in a rat-infested basement you stupid losers! Please can wikipedia please ban those who vandalize! I'm sick of this crap! I'd fix it myself if I knew Puder alot better!

'known for his amazing stint in World Wrestling Entertainment' - Errr, what ? who changed the Amazing ? A couple of very great backstage segments and a fantastic exit from the rumble is amazing by anyones standards. I've changed the words back!
Who trained him and what year did he start? See, I don't even know that, I'd fix it if I knew —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.1.96.154 (talk) 05:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC).Reply

First PPV?

"Puder competed in his first WWE pay-per-view event, being entered in the 2005 Royal Rumble Match." Actually, this was not Puder's 1st WWE PPV; in Armageddon 2004, Puder faced Mike Mizanin in a "Dixie Dogfight" boxing match. The WWE Tough Enough article, which states the 2005 Royal Rumble was Puder's 1st and only WWE PPV, also needs correction.

I agree so I added the information and edited the article... --Gregorynovella

Sexual Orientation

Should a LGBT tag be added? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.179.185 (talk) 08:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

that would require a source... Gregorynovella (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC).Reply

People editing themselves?

I was wondering about User:DanielPuder editing this article. I had heard(possibly may be bs though) that wikipedia did not like the idea of people making/editing articles about themselves. Would this be considered inappropriate editing? Likewise, is the possibility that User:DanielPuder is NOT the Daniel Puder of the article, in which case it's a person claiming to be someone that he is not. Or is this all alright, and i'm just making trouble where none exists? Any comments would be appreciated! Spoke shook (talk) 10:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

3rd possibility, someone who actually IS called Daniel Puder who happens to like wrestling? After all, there can't only be one Daniel Puder in the world. MrZoolook (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

It has come to my attention that people who are either working for Daniel Puder or Puder himself are removing portions of the article that seem to paint Puder in some unfavorable light, but the problem is, these portions are sourced though, while Puder and co. claim these are lies, they don't have proof to back up these claims. These are the portions that they are trying to remove: Template:Quote Source: [[1]] Template:Quote Source: [[2]] Template:Quote Source: [[3]]

The editor removing these portions are Mylifemypower and even claimed that the editors adding these portions to the article are bullying Puder, here's the quote:

Template:Quote

I take offense to this because I am one of the editors who researched these portions, and I have already sent a response to Mylifemypower, here's my response:

Template:Quote

How can this be resolved? Thanks. Greg The Webmaster (talk) 11:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Daniel Puder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Daniel Puder. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are here

editing on behalf of the subject, you need to read WP:BLP. It would be better to suggest edits here, rather than making changes your self as you maybe hampered by a WP:conflict of interest. Edit warring here will be fruitless. Your best bet if an impasse results is to post at WP:BLPN. Failing that, contact Wikipedia:Contact OTRS and explain your concerns there and then contact the Foundation. Please understand that the project wishes to be sensitive to the concerns of subjects of articles, but an encyclopedia may contain the subject of an article does not care for. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply