Talk:Culture of Greece
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Culture of Greece Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config
The Great Cull
G'day, I recently stumbled on this page and found something that has been looked after with great detail. However, it also filled to the brim with bias and unsourced filler. Since Wikipedia should be sourced and have a neutral point of view, I propose the deletion of all content along the lines of 'this is unequivocally great/beautiful' and that those paragraphs not filled with a single source be culled. Now since I am proposing a drastic departure from the article, and the fact that I am not motivated to go looking for the sources myself (which if I remember correctly is against Wikipedia's policy), I am initiating this discussion so I can get the general consensus of the few who regularly visit this page and not start a massive time wasting edit war. Thanks for reading. IronBattalion (talk) 23:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)