Talk:Council of the European Union
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Council of the European Union Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:ArticleHistory Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Composition
Neither in the opening nor the "Composition" section is it ever explicitly described how the Council is elected or appointed. Could someone who understands this with proper sourcing add this basic information about the formation and composition of this body? Criticalthinker (talk) 10:31, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- I understand this, now. Though, I'm still trying to figure out the write terminology to make this more clear to describe how national ministers are Council minister by virtue of being their country's ministers.
- In any case, I have an additional question. The Council of the EU apparently plays a role in formally proposing candidates to be EU Commissioners. But it is not clear in which configuration they meet to make those proposals. Does anyone have any online sources that explain this? I've looked at the Treaty and various EU webpages, but this part of the procedure in appointing a new commission is not specifically laid out. Criticalthinker (talk) 12:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
Link to European Union
There is no link in the text to European Union anywhere. Lots of links to sub-pages but none to the organisation itself. Pkoppenb (talk) 10:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- I think the lead is too short and does not summarise all aspects of the article. The citations in the lead can be removed if the information is in the article body.
- There is a single source orange banner at the top of "Foreign affairs", which has been there since 2015.
- There are uncited statements throughout the article.
I anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for raising the concern. I took care of the easy one: the Foreign Affairs section already had many sources. I likely do not have time to address the other concerns. meamemg (talk) 14:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Council of the European Union/1}}