Talk:Cosmic cross (astrology)

NPOV

The article seems to be implying that astrological influences are a given, i.e. truth rather than a way of looking at something. Someone familiar with astrology and a neutral point of view needs to look at this. --Mothperson 8 July 2005 16:22 (UTC)

I would like to say that the person who made a comment about NPOV above has made several comments about my work in the past and appears to be biased against me for reasons I do not know. It is only an article about astrology and is in the Category: astrological factors section. I don't know if the person who has made this comment and put the NPOV has a personal grudge against me because this person made some comments regarding another article and voted for its deletion. I was also not given an opportunity to put my point of view across to this person because I was not asked to email him or her privately on the public forum. --TracyRenee 17:30, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

Actually there is NPOV issue(s), for example: "many difficulties will present themselves because the square quite often brings about an unteniable situation that the native will take measures to be relieved from" states it as though it is a reality. I can assure you it is not. - RoyBoy 17:33, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Template:Respond - RoyBoy 17:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

T-square?

Um, not sure but if Cosmic Cross is a ancient term for T-square, couldn't we call the article T-square? I've only known of the T-square reference and tehre doesn't seem to be an article on it. Don't want to bother anyone, it's just a good faith question. Julia Rossi 06:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Example used not the best

Using an example of a well known person would make a better illustration of what to expect from a t-square. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhdeek (talk • contribs) 15:22, 2 January 2011 (UTC)