Talk:Corruption scandals in the Paris region
Template:WikiProject banner shell I'd be happy if somebody else helped me complete this! David.Monniaux 14:31, 3 Apr 2004 (UTC)
broken link
The link http://forums.transnationale.org/viewtopic.php?t=798, about the research section of the gendarmerie, is broken.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Corruption scandals in the Paris region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128203834/http://www.humanite.presse.fr:80/journal/2000-05-31/2000-05-31-226153 to http://www.humanite.presse.fr/journal/2000-05-31/2000-05-31-226153
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Corruption scandals in the Paris region. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040406101016/http://www.lexpress.fr/Express/Info/France/Dossier/dumas/dossier.asp?ida=420342 to http://www.lexpress.fr/Express/Info/France/Dossier/dumas/dossier.asp?ida=420342
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
Mainly about Chirac?
After reading this article it seems to me that anything in it not already in the article Jacques Chirac could be moved to that article and this article reduced to a link to that article. Everything else in it seems too trivial and out of date to be of encyclopedic interest. Vaughan Pratt (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)