Talk:Corporate crime
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Corporate crime Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Category handlerScript error: No such module "Copied".
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
File:Sciences humaines.svg This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mfellahi3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:30, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Notes
I am unsure if Corporate crime should be me merged with Corporate abuse or be left alone; either way some sort of correlation exists and needs to be addressed. For now I will only place a sublink to both places.
Also SEE: |Category:Corporate abuse|
what should be the proper action?
RoboAction 04:48, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Corporate terrorism?
The Monsanto article links to corporate terrorism, which redirects to this page. But the page is entirely vacant of any such content. Ken 16:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 03:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
No word socialogy
There's no such word as "socialogy" in the first line of "what penalties to impose." Stars4change (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Merge in
I propose that Organi-cultural deviance be merged into Corporate crime, on the grounds that the former is barely notable by itself, and both pages would benefit from the context of being together. There was a stale proposal to merge the former to White-collar crime, but this seems to be a better destination. For starters, "Organi" in this context is short for "Organization". The incoming page discusses the rationale for some forms of corporate crime. Klbrain (talk) 12:42, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
- Given no objections in almost 2 years, File:Yes check.svg Done Klbrain (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Corporate crime. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150307043033/http://www.bunker8.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/misc/crimgov.htm to http://www.bunker8.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/misc/crimgov.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Corporate Fraud?
"Corporate Fraud" redirects here. That is equivalent?
If it is the same, we would like to mention this term (with bold) in the lead. If not, please somebody define that too. :) Madacs (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Legal Research
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
— Assignment last updated by User78632 (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
"Undue weight"
Template:Reply to Does this section of this article give "undue weight" to the concept of "organi-cultural deviance?" Jarble (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, somewhat; but at least it's referenced, and being at the bottom of the article doesn't seem intrusive to the more important content earlier. Klbrain (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)