Talk:Condom
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Condom Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Message box". Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Todo User:MiszaBot/config User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn Template:Sister project
GA Reassessment
{{Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Condom/1}}
Renaming to Condom (External)
Hi all, I would like to propose that this page be renamed to "Condom (External)" to make it clear which type of condom this article focuses on. I am making a similar suggestion that the page currently titled "Female condom" be renamed to "Internal Condom". These terms (internal and external) are more medically accurate than male and female, since these devices can be utilized by all genders and sexes. In conjunction with this, I would plan to adjust wording within this article to predominantly use the terms internal and external. I am happy to explain this point further if there are any questions. Willmskinner (talk) 18:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alternately, we could leave the title as is, and increase the size and scope of the Internal Condom section... Willmskinner (talk) 03:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
"Double Bagging"
I have removed the following paragraph: ""Double bagging", using two condoms at once, is often wrongly believed to be an extra-effective method of birth control, but such use is more likely to cause condom breakage due to friction between the condoms." Because the source given (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fandr.13722) offers no data to support the claim that the use of two condoms simultaneously leads to higher breakage rates. In fact, another study from Thailand in 1997 found significantly decreased rates of breakage when two or more condoms were used simultaneously. https://journals.lww.com/jaids/abstract/1997/02010/multiple_condom_use_and_decreased_condom_breakage.11.aspx I would love it if others could search for any other data related to this often-discussed topic. Willmskinner (talk) 19:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)