Talk:Computer science
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Computer science Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:Afd-merged-from Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:Copied Template:Annual readership User:MiszaBot/config
Semi-protected edit request on 23 April 2024 (2)
Script error: No such module "protected edit request".
Hamoodyshal1 (talk) 15:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Berger E (2017) Csrankings: Computer science rankings. http://csrankings.org, accessed: 2017-05-01
- File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Bagumba (talk) 16:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Should the CS article be bumped up to Level 2 in vitality?
The computer science article is one of the most important, if not the most important article relating to computer science - since it literally is about computer science. I think it should be bumped up to atleast Level 2 for now since there is still some things we have to include into the article such as references. Vivaidris (talk) 19:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)