Talk:Chinese room
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chinese room Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Message box". User:MiszaBot/config Template:Archives
Structural prerequisites for Brodmannian personhood-yielding computer–brain
Searle (see: John Searle's Chinese Room Argument) is stupid. The human in the Chinese room can be replaced with a procedure/ a mechanism. The Chinese room is impersonal if it has few Brodmannian data-processing modalities, and fully personal if it has many Brodmannian modalities very closely mimicking the human brain, but it needs fundamental variation. Typical chatbots nowadays act like a single Brodmann area. They must have more variable and plenty modalities mimicking the human Brodmann areas. 2A02:587:4F0A:2300:6183:B7EA:86BB:D8DD (talk) 02:05, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- IMHO most philosophical musings are stupid. However in Wikipedia we do not make decisions of which philosopher stupid and who is not. We merely report their positions. If you have a reference to another well-known philosopher thinks Searle
is stupidmakes a mistake, we can take a look how it can be sed in Wikipedia. Otherwise please keep in mind that Wikipadia is not a discussion board, see WP:NOTAFORUM. --Altenmann >talk 02:11, 19 May 2025 (UTC)