Talk:Child erotica
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Child erotica Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". User:MiszaBot/config
Request for removal
Shouldn't this be removed on the grounds that it promotes child pedophilia? 94.133.68.129 (talk) 09:27, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
I don't think this page enables such, but I might recommend moving this article into its own section in the "underage pornography" article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Totodile493 (talk • contribs) 02:39, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Child erotica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929120151/http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070503f1.html to http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070503f1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Actual definition
The article lead seems to go into great detail of actually not explaining what child erotica is instead focusing on the use. Under this though practically any image can be considered erotica even that of a child in a onesie. I know some consider it to be provocative images intended to arouse like scantily dressed ones or nude ones posed for this purpose where pornography is images involving sex. I'd rather have such definitions included. Biofase flame| stalk 07:26, 31 May 2023 (UTC)