Talk:Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 December 2024 by GordonFindlay in topic Escutcheon incorrect
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".Template:Image requested

Untitled

I don't think the current page title is how he's best known at all, but he's one of those peers who has spread confusion over how he is best and correctly known - despite what the front cover and copyright page of his autobiography say, he is not "Lord Charles Brocket" (though I've created a redirect from that page). The cover of his autobiography is also a little unclear about whether we should call him Charlie or not! And almost every conceivable variation of Charles + Brocket pops up on either the dust jacket or front pages...

Can I suggest we have this at either Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket or even Charlie Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket (we have Frank Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford not Francis Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford for instance). Timrollpickering 16:09, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

He appeared on Bad Lads Army as "Charles Brocket", not "Charlie Brocket". I think Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket would be best. Proteus (Talk) 17:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Suggest that the materila relating to Antalya is not appropriate and irrelevant to this page - if indeed it is appropriate and relevant anywhere. Do we have any source references for it.

Wife's dates?

What are the dates shown: Isabell Maria Lorenzo (1982-1994)? Certainly not birth and death! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.152.124.208 (talk) 19:10, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The year 1982 is the year of the marriage.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

See some remarks

Seven and a half years have been mentioned. This seems to be wrong.

Descendants

It is very important, as for all other Peers and noble families, show the names of his children (and possible heirs), especially the daughter that is now a Princess (as wife of a Prince of Royal Blood) and the relations with the descendants of Queen Victoria and foreign Royal Families (Hohenzollern, King of Prussia). Alternow (talk) 10:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Escutcheon incorrect

The escutcheon shown in the armorial bearings does not match the blazon - quarters 2 and 3 in the image are gules, the blazon has argent; the charges are different. I cannot immediately find an on-line reference to correct the image or the blazon. Gordon Findlay (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply