Talk:Cartoon Network
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cartoon Network Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:FAQ Template:Afd-merged-from Template:TmboxTemplate:Talk other Template:Talk other Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config
Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2025
Davetheanimeguy (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Hi i'm only here to edit some mistakes thank u
- File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. EvergreenFir (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Controversies
I think it's worth creating a completely separate controversies sectional for the Wiki. Though they are mentioned in the programming section, I don't think that's necessarily accurate to the purpose of the programming tab. In my opinion, programming should discuss programming - what has been historically included on the network - while controversies surrounding programming decisions merits its own few paragraphs per controversy. Cartoon Network has notably had quite a few of them. Iagabrie (talk) 20:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Template:Ping The issue with controversy sections is we want to avoid an WP:UNDUE focus & stick with a WP:NPOV. Integration throughout an article is a common approach; I would also check out History of Cartoon Network to see if specific events are being covered in that article. These two essays have some good advice on this issue: Wikipedia:Criticism & Wikipedia:Controversial articles. If you want more specific advice, you can always ask questions over at the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Sariel Xilo (talk) 22:50, 8 June 2025 (UTC)