Talk:Capture of Fort Ticonderoga

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 April 2014 by Crab rangoons in topic Also...
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Category handlerScript error: No such module "Copied".

Location etc

I think the article should mention where Fort Ticonderoga was. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.178.187.222 (talk) 04:58, 14 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

The location of the Fort Ticonderoga was Ticonderoga, Essex, New York. Fort Ticonderoga was high up in the mountains.Allied Rangoons (talk) 23:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Significance?

This article claims in the first sentence that this battle "was the first significant action of the American Revolutionary War." Why? What does that make Lexington & Concord -- insignificant? Do tell. --Kevin Myers 12:32, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Wow, this article is a POV mess. Honestly, how can anyone seriously call this a "decisive victory"? The 47 men inside Fort Ticonderoga were all unarmed and engaged in non-military duties when the Americans arrived. The fort was guarded by a mighty one (read: one) sentry. Not a single shot was fired. There were no casualties.

Some "victory".
Indeed, it seems that the author(s) has taken a relatively insignificant event and tried to spin it into some grand and praiseworthy achievement. Pretty thin gruel. The only significance that I can attribute to the loss of Ticonderoga was that it opened the road to Canada - where real battles did occur. --Albrecht 21:53, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I've made a few changes, and others have modified the article independently. It is now NPOV to my satisfaction. Albrecht 20:48, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

It's quite amazing that two colonels managed so much on their own too. Did they have any troops with them, do you think?

Battle of Crown Point merged into this article?

I expanded that article, but it doesn't say much more than this article does. Should be merged or perhaps that section taken out of this article? --AW 18:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC) I don't know!. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.183.134.20 (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

fort ticconderoga

how do you prononce it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.174.175.72 (talk) 01:56, 26 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

tie-con-da-row-gah The Goat (talk) 00:29, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Minor but important difference

Other editors keep listing Ethan Allen and the Green Mountain Boys as colonials. Vermont was never a colony. So it is 100% factually inaccurate to call people from Vermont colonials. The Goat (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The area in question was actually a part of the colony of New York, or am I mistaken. Even if it wasn't Vermont was not a sepearte entity from the colonies, it must have laid in some British colony. So calling them colonials is technically correct. Arnold wasn't even from Vermont, but was born in Connecticut. So he was a colonial no matter how you look at it.--Jojhutton (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
The people living in Vermont had not recognized the authority of the colony of New York, the colony of New Hampshire or the King of England for several years prior to the Declaration of Independence. In fact after a petition for statehood in the USA was declined, Vermont declared itself an independent Republic in 1777.
Who is Arnold? Certainly Ethan Allen was born in Connecticut. Does that make him a colonial for the rest of his life? I would say no.The Goat (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply


Merge Battle of Crown Point

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the merger proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was to merge.

The Battle of Crown Point article is basically a stub. The action at Crown Point is not even properly a battle. In the context of the capture of Ticonderoga, it merits little more than one paragraph of mention.

Discuss. Magic♪piano 17:36, 15 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unless there is substantially more content that can be written about the Battle of Crown Point, since the Battle for Fort Ticonderoga and this battle are basically one and the same, I support this merge. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 23:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Based on the sources I've seen (3-4), I'm having a hard time imagining writing more than two paragraphs about it. It figures in a fairly small way in the disputes between Allen and Arnold, but most sources devote only about a paragraph to the main "action". Magic♪piano 03:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Seeing no objection here or elsewhere, Battle of Crown Point has been changed to redirect here. Magic♪piano 19:20, 22 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Talk:Capture of Fort Ticonderoga/GA1

prostitutes?

"Within its walls was a collection of heavy artillery including cannons, howitzers, prostitutes,and mortars, armaments that the Americans had in short supply.[1][2]"

While it is hard to downplay the role of prostitutes, I am not aware of any artillery by this name, so I presume that this is only a humorous addition.

Filbertius (talk) 16:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Being on the main page will bring those sorts of, umm, contributions to an article. Magic♪piano 17:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Mercifully, the use of prostitutes as artillery has since been outlawed by the Geneva Conventions. —Kevin Myers 02:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Template:Reflist-talk

Also...

...when Benedict Arnold rode into the Green Mountain Boy's camp, he had orders from George Washington. The problem was the Green Mountain Boys mocked Benedict Arnold. The Green Mountain Boy's leader, Ethan Allen stopped the mocking and said only he gave orders to the Green Mountain Boys.

Evidence:
Historic Valley Forge
Allthingsliberty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crab rangoons (talkcontribs) 23:29, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Listing the other Militias

The other militias did not actually participate in the capture of either Fort, so why are they listed? -Anon

  1. Cite error: Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".Script error: No such module "Namespace detect".
  2. Drake (1873), p. 130.