Talk:California State Route 60
Latest comment: 22 April 2018 by Kevon kevono in topic Viewpoint Evaluation
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 60 Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Viewpoint Evaluation
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
The History is very overrepresented, most of the article is mentioning the history of the Route 60. Underrepresentation can be argued amongst the information on the actual planning and engineering of the infrastructure. Such as the information on the actual plan, science, and funding of the project.
Tonylopez3 (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Tonylopez3
- I think it’s, to some extent, fine because the construction of the route isn’t significant compared to the route history itself. Kevon kevono (talk) 03:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)