Talk:California State Route 54
Latest comment: 12 January 2015 by RightCowLeftCoast in topic Itliong Vera Cruz overpass
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 54 Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Itliong Vera Cruz overpass
Should this article include information about the Itliong Vera-Cruz overpass?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- I could be convinced otherwise, but I'm leaning towards no, as there's so many bridges that are named in California. --Rschen7754 21:39, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
- Are there other named bridges over CA-54, that are also excluded?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised to find out that there are. But quite often the people the bridges are named after don't even have their own article, which comes awfully close to "Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information". --Rschen7754 18:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Larry Itliong (google book search)
- Philip Vera Cruz {google book search)
- --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- "Quite often"... but still, I'm not convinced this should be in the article. --Rschen7754 22:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- If there are named overpasses/underpasses perhaps a collapsed list of that verified content could be added to the article. This would only add to the completeness of the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Again, indiscriminate information... in the overall context of the road, it is not significant. (And we don't generally do collapsed lists in articles). --Rschen7754 22:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Count myself as opposed to the above opinion. But whatever, apparently my opinion and the potential of expanding the article with reliable sourced content is not important.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- Again, indiscriminate information... in the overall context of the road, it is not significant. (And we don't generally do collapsed lists in articles). --Rschen7754 22:41, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- If there are named overpasses/underpasses perhaps a collapsed list of that verified content could be added to the article. This would only add to the completeness of the article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 22:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- "Quite often"... but still, I'm not convinced this should be in the article. --Rschen7754 22:32, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know, but I wouldn't be surprised to find out that there are. But quite often the people the bridges are named after don't even have their own article, which comes awfully close to "Wikipedia is not a collection of indiscriminate information". --Rschen7754 18:30, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
- Are there other named bridges over CA-54, that are also excluded?--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2015 (UTC)