Talk:California State Route 209
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the California State Route 209 Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell".
Facts
I wasn't sure of all of the facts when i Wikified it, so if anyone living in that area or who has any info about SR 209 could confirm that what is there is true, i'd be very happy --Quadraxis 6 July 2005 01:16 (UTC)
Current lack of source support for all of 209 as city property
The link for the state legislation decertifying SR 209 as a state highway is dead. The last link in the paragraph implying that the entire highway was given or sold to the City of San Diego is uncertain. The city document only mentions the Rosecrans Street portion of SR 209. It makes this clearer by saying,
<templatestyles src="Template:Blockquote/styles.css" />
"The purpose of this acceptance was that upon the eventual sale of the parcels, the proceeds of sale would be deposited into an infrastructure fund specifically for the maintenance of those portions of then State Route 209 and State Route 274."
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".
Nowhere does it mention the status of Cañon Street, Catalina Boulevard, or Cabrillo Memorial Drive. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 21:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)