Talk:Caesars Palace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 4 April 2018 by Aircorn in topic Advertisement
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Tmbox[[Category:Template:GA/Topic good articles|Caesars Palace]]

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "English variant notice". Template:Tmbox Template:WikiProject banner shell

Opening comment

Frank Sinatra as most notable act?

What makes Frank Sinatra the "most notable" act appearing at Caesars Palace? Is there a famous or pop culture link (that I am not aware of) between Frank Sinatra and Caesars Palace that makes this an objective analysis?- -HobbesLeviathan (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply


Ten Billion Dollars? In 1962? Who wrote this nonsense?

A trillion dollars? The entire GDP of the USA in 2006 was 13 trillion. Can someone fix this stupidity? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.195.255.172 (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

That would be vandalism; I reverted it 75.166.54.155 01:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


why isn't it Caesar's Palace? Or even Caesars' Palace, if referring to all of the Caesars? Why no apostrophe? Saccerzd 12:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit: I'v ejust read in the article that "it is called caesars and not caesar's because every guest is a caesar". Surely, then, it should have been called caesars' palace? Saccerzd 12:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

the first picture is a shot of Caesars Augustus Tower, but the foreground is Bellagio, next door and accross Flamingo Road. It could be misleading.

Fair use rationale for Image:Caesarslogo.gif

File:Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Caesarslogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring re: blackjack criticism

I again reverted the contested, unsourced, pov statements. In my opinion, a {{fact}} is not enough here because the statements made in the edit have not only been contested and are unsourced, but by consensus felt to be a non-neutral pov in this and other articles previously. Also, please note that the source that was provided in a recent edit have nothing to do with the critical opinion(s) it was attached to. --SesameballTalk 20:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

No apostrophe

I presume that the article deliberately spells the name without an apostrophe. Shouldn't this be mentioned in the article's text? Was this an accident by the Palace's original builder/owner? Axl ¤ [Talk] 18:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's deliberate. According to this webpage, the developer of Caesars Palace, Jay Sarno, "wanted everyone who was a guest in his hotel to feel like a Caesar, which is why there is no apostrophe in Caesars Palace. It is a palace filled with Caesars, not the palace of one Caesar." I leave it to others to decide whether it's worth mentioning in the article. DH85868993 (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the explanation. In which case, they should have put an apostrophe after the "S". Anyway, I think that it is worth mentioning in the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 00:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Augustus Tower

I noticed that the article states in a couple of places that the Augustus Tower was renamed in 2015 to the Laurel Collection Tower. It does not cite a source, and, as far as I can tell, is incorrect: the Augustus and Octavius Towers together form the Laurel Collection, and represent Caesars boutique presence on the property. (In previous years, anecdotally, they've been deemphasizing the brand.) Regardless, the Augustus Tower is still named the Augustus Tower (see this property map). Mattpat (talk) 07:59, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Caesars Palace/GA1

Removed part about SIP telephones & manufacturer in one of the tower - insufficient encyclopedic value and likely to be deliberate advertising. 91.41.175.158 (talk) 20:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

This is probably one of the worst article I have come across for advertising. I am working at trimming back the fluff and puffery now. AIRcorn (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)Reply