Talk:Bryan Singer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Annual readership User:MiszaBot/config

@Template:U: Please stop undoing my intro edit.

There was no synthesis involved. It's pretty obvious that he hasn't been very active in Hollywood. Even if we can't say he's lacked work, we should at least say he's lacked any credits. —theMainLogan (tc) 06:27, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

To what end? The rest of the article (specifically the filmography) will make it clear that he lacks any credits, or at least any that any Wikipedia editor felt like adding to his article. Also, I don't see how it's not synthesis to claim that Singer hasn't had any work, unless you have a source that has made that claim. Do you have such a source? DonIago (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
https://www.timesofisrael.com/disgraced-hollywood-director-bryan-singer-said-living-in-israel-planning-comeback/
https://www.avclub.com/bryan-singer-documentary-about-himself-1850512101
https://variety.com/2023/film/news/bryan-singer-documentary-sexual-assault-claims-1235634544/
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/bryan-singer-floating-doc-that-will-address-sexual-misconduct-allegations-1235508331/
...and common sense based on information the article already provides.
Seriously, does all this talk about a "comeback" sound like they're describing a guy who's been doing well in the past few years?
theMainLogan (tc) 04:34, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
We can say (in our own words) what those sources say, but we can't use them to draw broader conclusions such as, "he hasn't been doing well" (unless a source says that); that's the very definition of original research. DonIago (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply