Talk:Boeing 737
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boeing 737 Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
| Template:Search box |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Template:Article history Template:Afd-merged-from Template:WikiProject banner shell User:MiszaBot/config Template:Broken anchors
Infobox aircraft replacing Aircraft begin and type
@Fnlayson per the top of the Infobox aircraft begin and Infobox aircraft type, they’re both being merged with Infobox aircraft. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- Where is the consensus for such a change? -Fnlayson (talk) 20:56, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Use mdy dates or Use MDY dates template
@Fnlayson: Hi, apologies if there's any other reason for it, but I believe that {{Use MDY dates}} redirects to {{Use mdy dates}} anyway, and so I'm unaware of any particular reason that the template wouldn't work - and yes, I did check in the edit preview to make sure that it was a valid template. Similar to how {{cn}} works in place of {{Citation needed}}. Fork99 (talk) 02:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh and for further context for anyone else reading this, this was intended as a dummy edit in order to make a WP:CWW attribution edit summary. Fork99 (talk) 02:10, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. That seemed like a fruitless edit and didn't think about a dummy edit then. Thanks -Fnlayson (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: HNRS 2000Critical Analysis and Social Responsibility
Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment
— Assignment last updated by Khall93 (talk) 06:40, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Should the -100 section give mention to People Express & Continental?
I individually went through the histories of each individual -100. 17 out of 30 passed through People Express (and then Continental after the merger). It seems notable that for many years, more than half of the fleet was owned by one airline, and it seems like it's important information about a type of such limited number.
(And that's pretty much the case for the entirety of the -100's lifespan - First, Lufthansa operated the majority of them, then they sold most of their -100s to PE, who operated the majority of them, then Continental bought PE and operated the majority of -100s)
Pabst blue ribbon led zeppelin (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)