Talk:Birkenstock
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Birkenstock Template:Pagetype. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Refideas User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
Myths and stereotypes
This is a stereotype with little basis in reality. The "flower children" were, for the most part, apolitical, and those who were political were not "traditionally associated with American liberalism". That's a conservative idea based on opposition to civil rights, women's rights, feminism, gay rights, etc. It has nothing to do with flower children or people who wear Birkenstocks. In fact, the "flower children" were notorious for their passivity, for doing their own thing, and for withdrawing from society, going back to nature by dropping out of straight society and allowing conservatives in the 1970s to fill that vacuum and take over the country. In reality, there is little to no connection between those who uphold American liberalism and those who wear Birkenstocks. Viriditas (talk) 00:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)