Talk:Birds of Pray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 20 July 2017 by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell".

Rolling Stone review

Perhaps we should junk the link to the RS review and replace it with maybe the AMG one? The RS one is a horrible review. It had no justification of the rating of 2/5. Nothing negative to say, nothing positive. Useless. Paulmer2003 (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Putting Rolling Stone reviews in articles has proved a waste of time as all the links are dead now! I think you might have to be a subscriber to see them. So the AMG one is going in! Iangurteen (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
OK, someone had beaten me to it with the AMG review, so I've deleted the RS review and put in one I found at Shaking Through (Not very favourable but at least it justifies it's mark!) Iangurteen (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birds of Pray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Birds of Pray. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply