Talk:Banzhaf power index

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 16 June by Otr500 in topic External links
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:British English Oxford spelling Template:WikiProject banner shell

[Untitled]

I'm not quite sure how to write the math part. Someone with a little bit more math writing skills want to take a shot at it? --Zoop 16:55, 24 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

History

The calculation is wrong. BC is not a majority coalition. I am removing this section, rather then redo it. No Info is better then wrong info! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.246.2.25 (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

My Bad. Added it back in Calc was correct after all!

References

Need the complete reference for Straffin Koczy 16:04, 30 July 2007 (UTC).Reply

Indirect voting systems

I think we need another section to explain the voting powers of citizens that elect delegates who then have to vote en bloc, as for example in the Electoral College (United States). I think, this is an important application as it also explains the fairness of the Penrose method for such systems. There, the voting powers (i.e, the Banzhaf power index) of people from polities of different sizes are equal if the delegations of each polity receive their voting weight according to the square root of the population they represent and if the vote en bloc. Obviously, the voting powers of the delegations are not equal then but reciprocal to the voting power of the people in their respective elections for the delegations.

In contrast to this 2-stage application, the article currently deals with 1-stage systems only, as applies to the Banzhaf indexes of people in referendums or the Banzhaf indexes of delegations in parliaments. It would be interesting to show how these indexes translate to the indexes of the people electing the delegations.

Please comment on this endeavor before I start introducing the new section proposed here. Tomeasy T C 23:24, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd love to see this added! Closed Limelike Curves (talk) 00:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banzhaf power index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Banzhaf power index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

External links

Template:See

Some things just grow during incremental edits and sometimes get out of hand. The "External links" section, one of the optional appendices, was expanded to 12 entries, organized into three subsections. Three seems to be an acceptable number, and of course, everyone has their favorite to try to add for a fourth. Consensus needs to determine this. A tag indicates concerns.
However, none is needed for article promotion.
Some links may be included in WP:ELNO, or What Wikipedia is not (policy) such as WP:NOTREPOSITORY or WP:NOTGUIDE.
The External links guideline This page in a nutshell: Template:Tq
Second paragraph, Template:Tq
    • Please also note:
  • WP:ELBURDEN: Template:Tq. Please do not add back more links without consensus. Simple solution to facilitate career maintenance tag. Move links here for discussion.
Moved links: