Talk:Baby Ruth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 May 2025 by 2601:84:8382:1290:5519:738B:8D5F:757E in topic Original recipe?
Jump to navigation Jump to search

<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />

Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Annual readership

Some notes

I think this baby may have grown to a stub now. I'll see if anyone else pitches in. --Amoore 06:42, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)

Where is the reference to Caddy Shack?! Come on! That scene in the pool is classic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.70.138.182 (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

State of the Chocolate Bar: the view from Australia

FYI, kind of like a Snickers, only Baby Ruth's came first. HTH. - Ta bu shi da yu 06:33, 17 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've heard that the Snickers bar varies from country to country. --Gbleem 11:32, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ruth Williamson?

I remember reading in one of the Imponderables books in the Letters section about a theory that the candy bar was named after Ruth Williamson, the daughter or grand-daughter of two candy makers. As you can see, I can remember little about it. :P Libertyernie2 00:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • The edition called What Are Hyenas Laughing At, Anyway? (1995), p.84, reports the standard story about it being named for Grover Cleveland's daughter, with additional info that implies an answer to why they would name something in the 1920s for someone from a prior generation: "The trademark was patterned exactly after the engraved lettering of the name used on a medalion struck for the Chicago World's Columbian Exposition in 1893, and picturing the President, his wife, and daughter Baby Ruth." There is no mention of a Ruth Williamson, although it confirms that the Williamson Candy Company of Chicago invented the "Oh Henry!" bar in 1920, another eventual product of the Curtiss, the maker of Baby Ruth, both brands later being absorbed by Nestlé, of course. Wahkeenah 09:02, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
  • The letters portion of the edition How Do Astronauts Scratch an Itch? (1996), p. 288-289, confirms your recollection. There is a reference to another book, More Misinformation, by Tom Burnam: "Burnam concluded that the candy bar was named... after the granddaughter of Mr. and Mrs. George Williamson, candy makers who developed the original formula and sold it to Curtiss." The writeup goes on to note that marketing the product as being named for an executive's granddaughter would not likely carry much weight, hence their "official" story. Wahkeenah 09:17, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot. I wondered where I read that. Libertyernie2 22:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

My father owned and managed a grocery store throughout the 1950s and 1960s, and he told me that the kids invariably called it a "Babe Ruth bar" when asking for it. WHPratt (talk) 14:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

That association is presumably what they intended. :) Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 16:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Planters Nut Roll

I'm helping scan some old company newsletters. In a 1971 edition, there is a section where an employee complained about the selection of candy in the machines, specifically asking for Baby Ruth. The company reply was that the selection was rotated and that the Planters Nut roll was stocked and that it was a rebranded Baby Ruth and both were made by Curtiss. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 20:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Baby Ruth wrapped.jpg

File:Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Baby Ruth wrapped.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

feces section

The whole "resemblence to human feces" section seems to exist to talk about Caddyshack. It's largely unsourced, and of dubious value to the article as a whole. I suggest deletion of that section.Nat Gertler (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

You may be right. It could be a minor case of "coat-racking". I rewrote it to present the facts and take away the teenage-level hype. But it still may be deletable. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 01:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
What happened to the section? Its worthwhile to at least mention it was, in fact, the candy bar used in the movie. "DOOOOTIE!!!" Twebb72 (talk) 06:04, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

George hamilton iv song

Is it worth mentioning the reference to the sweet in the title of george hamilton IV's country song (later covered by marilyn manson), "A Rose and a Baby Ruth"? (79.190.69.142 (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2009 (UTC))Reply

I would hasten to add that Al Kooper covered the song also.THX1136 (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Trivia

In the movie Hellboy, the character Hellboy is feed with Baby Ruth by his human stepfather. 62.178.137.216 (talk) 18:29, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

When Did Nabisco Make Baby Ruth Bars?

According to a commercial probably from the 1980s, Nabisco made some Baby Ruth and Butterfinger bars some time before Nestlé made them. Cbsteffen (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Template:Substituted comment Substituted at 08:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced content

I cannot find any sources to verify the content below, so I have moved this content from the article's In popular culture section to here. North America1000 04:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"President Richard Nixon served Baby Ruth candy bars on Air Force One.Script error: No such module "Unsubst"."

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Not really named for President's daughter

I thought it was well-known that the candy wasn't really named after a baby who'd died many years before. Just something the company claimed to get around naming the candy after a real person who wasn't getting any royalties for their use of his name. 97.126.25.198 (talk) 16:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Original recipe?

The section which claims to show the original recipe includes high fructose corn syrup, which was not developed until roughly 50 years after the introduction of the product. (click the link in the article to the wiki page about HFCS). Somewhere, there is an issue. I won't be monitoring. Do what you wish with this observation. 2601:84:8382:1290:5519:738B:8D5F:757E (talk) 20:19, 1 May 2025 (UTC)Reply