Talk:Assassination
<templatestyles src="Module:Message box/tmbox.css"/><templatestyles src="Talk header/styles.css" />
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Assassination Script error: No such module "pagetype".. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Template:Find general sources |
| Archives: Template:Comma separated entries<templatestyles src="Template:Tooltip/styles.css" />Auto-archiving periodScript error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".: Template:Human readable duration File:Information icon4.svg |
Script error: No such module "Check for unknown parameters".Script error: No such module "Check for deprecated parameters".
Script error: No such module "Article history". Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Script error: No such module "Category handler".Script error: No such module "Copied".
Script error: No such module "Message box". Template:Former TAFI
Definition
How can assassination be described as "people calling it an extra-judicial killing that lacks due process". Assassination is by any definition illegal, it isn't exactly an extreme interpretation to describe it as "extra-judiacial", in fact that is a euphemism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.197.15.138 (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
"or military motives"
"or military motives": This should be removed, because it is not correct as it is against international law (perfidy):
“treacherous attempts upon the life of an enemy; as for example by keeping assassins in pay”
IHL by ICRC [ Rule 65. Killing, injuring or capturing an adversary by resort to perfidy is prohibited] Template:Quote
The examples such as given in the section "As military and foreign policy doctrine" are either not military but political: assassination of Reinhard Heydrich, and Vietnam on both sides). In the case of Isoroku Yamamoto and Rommel killing enemy military commanders who is in arms, by members of the armed forces, and not paid assassins, is not assassination: Richard III was not assassinated at the Battle of Bosworth.
I suggest that "or military motives" is removed. -- PBS (talk) 18:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
I suggest that military motives is a right way of dealing with the situation,if military does not take any actions trators will continue ruining the mission of uplifting the country because of “fame" Ts he po phakama (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Laws
Shouldn't there be info on the legality, laws or treaties regarding assassinations by governments? Hammerfrog (talk) 12:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Hitler
Is there a reason for not mentioning the assassination attempts on Hitler? He was quite high profile then. --JonValkenberg (talk) 16:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)