Talk:Archaeological site

Thank you, sjc. I was suffering a bit of a mental drought toward the end there. Stormwriter

Cool. I'll do a bit more on it when I get some time. user:sjc

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Archaeological site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080822055940/http://www.panorammer.com/panoramas/5_tambomachay_f.php to http://www.panorammer.com/panoramas/5_tambomachay_f.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:57, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Change wording

"Traditionally, sites are distinguished by the presence of both artifacts and features."

I would change it to "Traditionally, sites are distinguished by the presence of artifacts and/or features."

The reason for this, is because some sites will not have a feature, such as a temporary lithic worksite, or scatter site. As an archeologist, i can't tell you how many sites I've come upon that, yes they had lithics, but there were no features associated with the site, but nonetheless, they were still recorded as a site. JBurris123 (talk) 17:08, 3 April 2025 (UTC)