Talk:Apiaceae

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Script error: No such module "Banner shell". Template:Annual readership

Names

this article as I found it equated Apiaceae with umbelliferae.

however, umbelliferae redirects to the parent of THIS family, which is Apiales! -- Tarquin 16:31 Feb 27, 2003 (UTC)

Good catch. It's actually Apiaceae. I'll fix it. Rei

But when did this name change happened? 15 - 20 years ago when I learned about them, I learned about umbelliferae so it was a surprise for me to find that they are now called apiaceae.89.137.187.148 (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)ApassReply

An automated Wikipedia link suggester has some possible wiki link suggestions for the Apiaceae article, and they have been placed on this page for your convenience.
Tip: Some people find it helpful if these suggestions are shown on this talk page, rather than on another page. To do this, just add {{User:LinkBot/suggestions/Apiaceae}} to this page. — LinkBot 10:40, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Apiaceae reportedly counters the adverse (carcinogenic) properties of aflatoxin

The wiki article on aflatoxin mentions Apiaceae and links to this article (which brought me here), yet (at least after a cursory glance over this article) I find no mention of aflatoxin and Apiaceae's role in countering the carcinogens produced by aflatoxin here, and thought it might be worth adding. Norlns22 (talk)

Boris Lariushin/plagiarism charges

Interesting blog post that refers to this Wikipedia article:

http://stories.rbge.org.uk/archives/1321 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.111.254.17 (talk) 13:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suggest this article gets renamed

I suggest this article gets renamed as "umbelliferae" as I would suggest that more people probably know this plant family by this name. Many plants in this family, such as celery or carrots, are famous for their bell-shaped tops (hence this name). ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

How about Apiaceae (Umbelliferae)? I guess this might be seen as setting a bad precedent, but surely an exception should be made in this case. Nihola (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Since Umbelliferae redirects here, changing the name is unnecessary. Peter coxhead (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Good enough. Nihola (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Distribution

Does anyone know anything about distribution? Are Apiaceae species found on every continent? etc... Hypershock (talk) 04:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Apiaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at Template:Tlx).

Template:Sourcecheck

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why is Centella not referenced here since now that Centella is now placed in the Apiaceae family

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centella 2001:448A:6060:A89:BD22:2C5C:E0C4:712C (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

It is correctly included in List of Apiaceae genera. Peter coxhead (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply